We surveyed 300 union members across English and French Canada. The findings challenge what unions have assumed about why members don't show up — and what it actually takes to change that.
These aren't opinions. They're correlations from 300 real members — and they point to a clear, actionable conclusion.
Members who attended at least one meeting are 4× more likely to describe themselves as actively engaged. This is the single most powerful lever unions have — and it's being underused.
We couldn't find a single member who never votes and still considers themselves strongly engaged — not one.
Work schedule conflicts (37%) and family or personal commitments (20%) are the top barriers. These are design problems. They can be fixed with better meeting formats, timing, and access — not better messaging.
More than half of non-attending members say they would participate if virtual or hybrid options were available. This is the highest-ROI, lowest-friction change unions can make right now.
27% of members don't believe their involvement makes a difference. 19% find meetings irrelevant to their situation. Access improvements alone won't reach them. Restoring a sense of agency requires something deeper — two-way dialogue, visible outcomes, member voice in decisions.
Unions are not failing at keeping members informed — 73% of members feel well-informed. The failure point is the design of the moments where members are asked to show up.
The structural barriers — schedule, access, format — are fixable. 54% of non-attenders say they'd come if you met them where they are. That's not apathy. That's an invitation.
Members who feel their involvement doesn't matter need to experience that it does. Town halls, real-time Q&A, and visible decision feedback are the interventions that move this group.
The data is unambiguous: offering virtual access is the single highest-return change a union can make to expand participation. It requires no persuasion. Members are already willing.
Want to know if your members are engaged? Stop asking them. Look at who attended at least one meeting in the last year and who voted. Those two data points predict engagement state more reliably than any survey.
The survey brief includes persona breakdowns, sector comparisons, and a full methodology section. It's available now — no wait, no paywall.
300 respondents · English and French Canada · April 2026 · Margin of error ±5.7 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Public sector 62%, private sector 33%, not-for-profit 3%. All findings are correlational, not causal.
Motion Meetings builds the platform Canada's unions use to run secure AGMs, ratification votes, and hybrid town halls. One platform. Every voice..